::Minutes
Index>>
Minutes
of a meeting of the Parish Council held on 27th May 2009
in the
Market House, Church Street, Martock, Somerset.
There were present:
Roger Powell Chairman
Jenny Becker, David Parris
Chris Bell, David Reynolds
Philip Jackson, Richard Walsh
Patrick Palmer (arrived during agenda item 36/09)
In attendance:
Ian Andrews Parish Clerk
Douglas Campbell County Councillor
Thirty members of the public
The Chairman welcomed everyone to the first meeting of the Parish
Council in the newly refurbished Market House. He announced that
the former Parish Clerk, Mrs. Vera Budge, had donated a new gavel
and stand for use at Parish Council meetings.
26/09 Election of Officers
The following members were elected to office for the year 2009/2010:
1. Chairman of the Parish Council Roger Powell
2. Vice-Chairman of the Parish Council David Parris
3. Chairman of the Recreation Committee David Parris
4. Chairman of the Village Committee Chris Bell
5. Chairman of the Planning Committee David Reynolds
6. Chairman of the Finance Committee Christopher Price
7. Chairman of the Emergency Planning Committee Christopher Price
8. Footpaths Representative Philip Jackson
27/09 Apologies for absence
Apologies for absence were received from Andrew Clarke, Valerie
Knight,
Jason Mann and Christopher Price.
28/09 Chairman’s notices
There were none.
29/09 Declarations of interest
There were none but it was pointed out that Patrick Palmer, who
had been delayed attending the meeting, would declare an interest
under agenda item 16 upon his arrival.
30/09 Police matters
In the absence of PCSO Jason Helyar, the
Village Committee Chairman, Chris Bell, reported that implementation
of the No Cold Calling
Zone had been delayed to allow time for a letter to be delivered
each household explaining the scheme and providing for an opt out.
He also reported that there would be a police stand at the Martock
Church Fête on 6th June.
31/09 Minutes
The Minutes of the meeting held on 29th April 2009 were agreed
as being a correct record.
32/09 Matters arising
There were none.
33/09 Confirmation of the actions from previous Minutes
Action 090429/1 Shaun Byrne: The Parish Clerk reported he had
written to Shaun Byrne but had not had a reply. The Chairman responded
that he had receive an e-mail from Mr. Byrne stating his intention
to resign from the Parish Council and that he expected a letter
soon.
Action 090128/3 Bye-law for the Precinct: The Parish Clerk reported
he had written to all retailers in the Precinct requesting their
written support for a bye-law banning the riding of bicycles in
the Precinct.
Action: 090128/3: Parish Clerk (ongoing) Action 090325/1 Road white lining in Bower Hinton: In the absence
of Patrick Palmer from this section of the meeting, the action
was outstanding (see 37/09 below).
Action 090325/6 Rubbish bin for skate park area: The action was
outstanding.
Action: 090325/6: Parish Clerk (ongoing)
Action 090429/2: Traffic bollards at Pair Trees, Bower Hinton:
The Parish Clerk reported he had spoken to Kim Sharp about the
installation of wooden bollards.
Action 090429/3 Official Opening of the Market House: The event
had taken place.
Action 090429/4 Hire cost of the Market House: The hire costs
had been agreed.
Action 090429/5 Outstanding invoice sent to the Pavilion Playgroup:
The Parish Clerk reported payment had been received.
Action 090429/6 Grounds Maintenance contract specification: The
action had been completed.
Action 090429/7 Tenders for Grounds Maintenance contract: The
action had been completed.
Action 090429/8 Recreation Ground Perimeter Track: The action
had been completed.
Action 090429/9 Piping of the ditch on the Recreation Ground adjacent
to the skate park. Advice had not yet been sought from Mr. Roger
Meecham of SCC.
Action: 090429/9: David Parris (ongoing)
Action 090429/10 Play Mound: David Parris reported on advice he
had received from SSDC that a metal fence should not be erected.
Action 090429/11 Pavilion external water tap: The action had been
completed.
Action 090429/12 Flooding at the pedestrian crossing in North
Street: In the absence of Patrick Palmer at this part of the meeting,
the action on him to speak to Kim Sharp of SCC was outstanding.
Action: 090429/12: Patrick Palmer (ongoing) Action 090429/13: Abandoned cars in Dimmocks Lane: The Parish
Clerk reported that the cars had been removed.
Action 090429/14: Members’ Away Day:
The action to write a briefing paper was outstanding.
Action: 090429/14: Chairman (ongoing) Action 090429/15 Committee Chairmen to indicate their willingness
to re-stand for election: The action had been completed.
34/09 Parishioner participation
Mention was made that the June issue of the Leveller had already
been delivered, in which the letter about the No Cold Calling Zone
would have been inserted (see 30/9 above). The Chairman responded
that a special delivery of the letter would now have to be made
to all houses in Martock.
35/09 Official Opening of the Market House
The Chairman reported on the Official Opening of the Market House
on 15th May 2009 by Douglas Campbell, which many representatives
of organisations connected with the project had attended. He thanked
the Parish Clerk for his efficient organisation of this very successful
event.
The Chairman further reported that the architects
of the refurbishment, Benjamin & Beauchamp of Wedmore, Somerset would be entering
the project for the William Stansell Award, the RIBA Western Daily
Press Community Award and the RIBA Town & Country Design Awards.
He proposed the Parish Council should pay for half the entry cost
of the latter award amounting to £74.50. This was unanimously
agreed.
36/09 Proposed Multi-Use Community Facility (MUCF)
The Chairman announced that this item was
a progress report. He reported on the ongoing referendum/survey,
the distribution of
leaflets throughout Martock, the consultation sessions held in
the Market House and the ensuing debate within the community. Such
involvement, the Chairman said, was a sign of a strong community.
He reiterated that the capital costs of the project would not be
a charge to the Council Tax and that the running costs of the proposed
facility would be shared by the three partners. He reminded the
meeting that the recent increases in the Parish Council’s
precept had been to complete the projects as set out in the Local
Community Plan and that, if the running costs for the proposed
facility proved to be too high, the project would not proceed.
The Chairman reiterated that the Parish Council did not intend
to increase the parish precept further in order to fund this project
and reminded the meeting there was little difference between the
maintenance and running costs of the Parish Hall, the Youth Centre
and the Gospel Hall to those projected for the MUCF, when their
age and deteriorating state was taken into account.
The Chairman reported that, once the project Feasibility Study
had been completed, it had always been the intention of the Steering
Group to seek community support or otherwise for the proposal,
and it had been agreed that the project could move forward confidently
with a positive mandate should be at least 50% of households balloted
voted in favour.
The Chairman commented on the help given by SSDC in acting as
a post box for the return of the voting slips and that the Secretary
of the Steering Group was collecting them, counting the votes and
recording the comments made.
The Chairman further reported that, if a
clear mandate had not be received from the postal vote, it was
originally intended to
visit the non-voting households and to politely ask them to submit
a vote one way or the other. However, after commencement of the
anonymous ‘no campaign’, this course of action was
abandoned because it was felt that it would be subjected to a charge
of coercion. Instead, an impartial reminder was now being delivered
to all households that had not responded to the first ballot or
had not indicated their address on the first ballot sheet, asking
them to submit a vote and providing them with a new ballot paper
and a pre-paid envelope addressed to SSDC. It was the Chairman’s
opinion that, once the results of the voting were available and
the partners to the project had decided on the way forward, a public
meeting should be held to present the results to the community.
At this point of the meeting the Chairman invited members of the
public to participate and the Parish Clerk reminded the meeting
that the debate would not be recorded verbatim and that only points
raised would be minuted. There then followed a considerable debate
covering the following issues:
It was questioned whether the action taken by the Steering Group
to ascertain household views constituted a referendum or a survey.
The Chairman made it clear that the aim was to impartially gather
the views of Martock residents and the process, irrespective of
its name, was designed to achieve that.
Concern was raised over there being just one person counting the
votes without being overseen by anyone else. It was suggested that
the results should be independently scrutinised. The Chairman responded
that he was happy to submit the vote recording to independent scrutiny.
It was suggested that, if an inconclusive result was forthcoming,
the project should be postponed for a year to gather more information,
after which a formal referendum should be held.
The validity of a second ballot was questioned, and the Parish
Council was accused of moving the goalposts. The Chairman reminded
the meeting that the aim was to impartially ascertain the views
of as many households as possible.
In answer to a request to divulge the results so far received,
the Chairman replied that such action would be wholly inappropriate
while voting was still in progress. A suggestion was made to accept
the vote as it stood as at 15th May 2009.
Questions on the cost to date of the project
were raised. The Chairman replied that approximately £30,000 had been spent
so far, primarily on fees for the MUCF Design Appraisal and the
Options Appraisal for the disposal and redevelopment of the existing
buildings. Of that amount, approximately £20,000 had been
received from external grants. He confirmed that Martock Christian
Fellowship had paid one third of the costs as agreed.
It was suggested that any community facility on the scale of the
proposed project should be managed by the District Council and
should be a charge to District wide Council Taxes.
The Chairman was urged to seek advice from South Somerset District
Council on the validity of the referendum/survey process. The Chairman
expressed his dismay that some people clearly thought the Parish
Council might act in a corrupt manner. He asked that any specific
allegations should be declared. None was forthcoming.
The Chairman thanked everyone for their contributions. He reported
that the Steering Group would meet in the near future and it would
make a recommendation to each of the partners on a way forward.
This recommendation would be considered at a future Parish Council
meeting.
Two separate issues were then raised by members of the public:
It was suggested that draft minutes of Parish Council should be
made public after each meeting so that parishioners who had attended
could suggest amendments prior to their being ratified.
In answer to a question about the single pedestrian crossing in
the precinct, the Village Committee Chairman, Chris Bell, replied
that the work was not yet complete and that the cobbled surface
at the end of the crossing would be removed and a second crossing
installed across the mouth of the car park.
37/09 County & District Councillors’ reports
Douglas Campbell gave a résumé of
his work as County Councillor for Martock. He said that he had
enjoyed being part
of the Parish Council and wished everyone well.
The Chairman reminded members it was Douglas’s
last meeting as County Councillor and proposed a vote of thanks
to him for all
his work on behalf of Martock. This was unanimously agreed by members.
With regard to Action 090325/1 (see 33/09 above) Patrick Palmer
was questioned about the road white lining in Bower Hinton. He
responded that County Highways believed it had done all that was
required and that there was little point in pursuing the matter
further.
At this point of the meeting the Chairman brought forward agenda
item 16, Planning Committee.
38/09 Planning Committee
The Committee Chairman, David Reynolds, reported upon the following
applications:
1. 09/01829/LBC & 09/01794FUL: Demolition of existing conservatory
and the erection of a garden room to rear of dwelling house – Mr. & Mrs.
D. Marshall,
14 Church Street, Martock. Members agreed to recommend the application
for approval.
2. 09/01623FUL: Erection of a 2m high boundary
fence – Mr. & Mrs.
R. Goodwin, Little Coat House, Coat, Martock. Members agreed to
recommend the application for approval.
3. 09/01861/FUL: Demolition of existing
garage/workshop and adjacent dwelling and the erection of twenty-four
dwellings, associated
parking, landscaping, highways and associated works – Mr. & Mrs.
J. Yandle, Yandel’s Garage, North Street, Martock. Members
agreed that the blocks of 2½ storey housing should be lowered
to 2 storeys and that the gabled end house on the left entrance
from North Street should be of the same design as the house on
the opposite side of the entrance. Members also agreed they did
not wish to see the loss of shopping facilities at the north end
of Martock.
4. 09/01910/FUL: Erection of a 15kw wind
turbine on a 15m high tower on land at Bower Hinton Farm, Bower
Hinton, Martock – Mr.
P. Palmer.
Patrick Palmer, who had arrived after the start of the meeting,
declared an interest in this application but remained present to
answer any questions of clarification. Patrick Palmer left the
meeting before a vote was taken.
Members agreed to recommend the application for approval.
At this point of the meeting Patrick Palmer returned.
The Committee Chairman reported receipt of two further applications:
5. 08/04481/FUL: Erection of a single storey
building for the carrying out testing of equipment manufactured
by the applicant – Unwin
House, Coat Road, Martock. Members agreed to recommend the application
for approval.
6. 09/00128/FUL: Erection of a specialist
dementia care home, together with the associated vehicular and
pedestrian access and
landscaping – Land at Foldhill Lane, Martock. Members confirmed
that they were not prepared to consider any application outside
the current development line prior to agreement of the new Local
Development Framework unless there was a proven community need.
The Committee Chairman reported that, under the provisions of
delegated authority, he had recommended the following application
for approval, asking that it be processed as soon as possible on
compassionate grounds:
7. 09/01749/LBC: Replacement of existing unstable ceiling to enable
the installation of a ceiling track, hoist and recessed lighting.
39/09 Finance Committee
In the absence of the Committee Chairman, the Council Chairman
presented:
1. The budget for financial year 2009/10, which members agreed.
2. The accounts for April 2009, which were ratified, and the list
of receipts and payments for May 2009, which were agreed.
40/09 Recreation Committee
1. Grounds Maintenance contract: The Parish Clerk reported letters
inviting tenders had been sent to four companies.
2. Recreation Ground Perimeter Track: The Committee Chairman,
David Parris, spoke to the specification which had been tabled
and asked that any comments by members should be sent to him as
soon as possible.
3. Redecoration of the interior of the Pavilion:
The Committee Chairman recommended the interior of the Pavilion
should be redecorated.
After discussion, the Committee Chairman agreed to speak to the
Youth Development Officer, Claire Cruwys, to ascertain whether
the ‘Army of Angels’ would be able to undertake the
work under supervision.
Action: 090527/1: David Parris 4. Additional/new signage for the Recreation
Ground: It was agreed that the Committee Chairman and Richard
Walsh should consider the
design for a new sign for the Recreation Ground and that they should
ask whether Paulls & Co would be prepared to sponsor it.
Action: 090527/2: David Parris & Richard
Walsh 5. Additional picnic table for the Recreation
Ground: It was agreed to purchase an additional picnic table and
the Committee Chairman
agreed to arrange with Kim Dike for the table to be delivered to
his works.
Action: 090527/3: David Parris 6. The Committee Chairman reported that a new bench in memory
of a young member of the cricket club, would be sited near to the
cricket pavilion and recommended the purchase of a further seat
to be sited in the south west corner of the Recreation Ground.
Members agreed to the purchase of a suitable seat.
Action: 090527/4: David Parris
7. The Council Chairman reported that all tennis court bookings
would in future be made at the Market House Community Office. He
agreed to proceed with the new arrangements and to arrange for
an explanatory leaflet to be sent to every household as soon as
possible. He confirmed that all maintenance of the public courts,
with the exception of resurfacing, would now be the responsibility
of the Tennis Club.
Action: 090527/5: Chairman
41/09 Village Committee 1. Precinct: The Committee Chairman, Chris
Bell, reported on the work being undertaken in the Precinct which
should be completed
before the next Producers’ Market in June. Dog hitches and
cycle racks would be installed and quotes were being obtained for
replacement lighting. He further reported that hanging baskets
would be placed in the Precinct and that window boxes would be
arranged for the Market House.
2. Lighting in Church Street: The Committee Chairman reported
the contract had been signed and work should commence in the near
future.
3. Village gateways: The Committee Chairman reported he was waiting
for a report from Andrew Clarke concerning the style of the gateways.
Action: 090527/6: Andrew Clarke
4. Calor Somerset Village of the year 2009:
After discussion, it was agreed not to enter the competition
for 2009 but that Val
Knight, Jenny Becker and the Chairman of the Council would benchmark
Martock’s performance against the application form with a
view to entering the competition in 2010.
Action 090527/7: Val Knight, Jenny Becker and the Chairman
5. Parish Hall kitchen: The Council Chairman reported that he
had received various adverse comments about the state of the kitchen.
After discussion, Philip Jackson agreed he would consider acting
as the project manager for any refurbishment and the Chairman of
the Council agreed to canvass user groups for their requirements.
Action: 090527/8: Philip Jackson and the Chairman
6. Martock Church Fête: It was agreed
that the Parish Council would not have a stall but it was reported
that Christopher Price
as Emergency Committee Chairman, would have a stall for Emergency
Planning.
42/09 Parishioner participation
There was none.
43/09 Correspondence
The Parish Clerk reported receipt of a letter from Somerset Highways
giving notice that Stoke Road, Martock would be closed on 8th June
2009 for two weeks.
He also reported receipt of a letter from
SSDC concerning Community Play & Youth Day. After discussion it was agreed to make a
donation of £250 towards the cost of the day.
The Chairman of the Council reported receipt of a letter from
the Chairman of SSDC, Ian Martin, thanking the Parish Council for
inviting him to the Official Opening of the Market House Community
Office and congratulating the Parish Council on the new venture.
He also reported receipt of a letter from
Andrew Orchard concerning a new website which would cost £3000 to set up and an annual
maintenance cost of £400. The Chairman of the Council agreed
to circulate a mock-up of the proposed website format and asked
Committee Chairmen to see whether savings could be made from their
budgets to pay for the cost of a new website.
Action: 090527/9: Council and Committee Chairmen
44/09 Business for future meetings
Philip Jackson requested consideration for the repair and hanging
of the clock inside the Market House.
45/09 Date of next meeting
It was agreed to meet again on Wednesday 24th June 2009 at 7.30pm.
It was resolved to exclude the press and public from the remainder
of the meeting due to the confidential nature of the business to
be discussed.
Following the confidential items, there being no further business,
the Chairman declared the meeting closed at 11.50pm.
::Back
to top of page
|